1695 Corbat v. Region 1
Case No: 1695
2014
Representative Kapa withdrew Corbat’s grievance because the local agreements were being applied in accordance with the local parties’ longstanding practice regarding the compensation of drivers. Corbat has not identified any deficiency in the handling of his grievance. It was withdrawn because it had no merit. Any concerns regarding the local union’s collective bargaining policy should be addressed to the membership in the form of a motion at a membership meeting rather than in the form of a grievance.
Issues addressed in this decision
Collective bargaining policyContract interpretations
Powers of Local Union officers
Powers of membership
Processing of grievances
Rational basis test