1531 Nafus v. Region 9

There is no evidence that Nafus’ status as a Beck objector, or his public expressions of dissatisfaction with the Union influenced the Representative’s decision in any way. Nafus’ refusal to sign a waiver that would allow Management to confirm his completion of an anger management program violated the terms of his prior reinstatement agreement. Furthermore, it would not have been sufficient to establish that Nafus had completed such a program to achieve his reinstatement. Nafus would also have had to demonstrate that he had learned to control his temper in his encounters with his supervisors, and the evidence does not support such a conclusion.