1508 Pairan v. Region 3

The record shows that the Local Union Representatives worked hard to build a case on Pairan’s behalf. Unfortunately, the Local Union’s investigation only produced more evidence of his objectionable conduct in the plant. The evidence clearly established that Pairan was constantly annoying his co-workers with behavior that would constitute harassment under the Company’s Sexual Harassment Policy. Once this behavior was exposed, the Company’s position that it had to terminate Pairan to protect itself from future liability was justifiable and there was really nothing the Union could do to save Pairan’s job.