All Cases
1864 Jones v. International President, UAW
Local union elections carry a presumption of validity. To warrant overturning an election’s results and conducting a rerun, two requirements must be met: (1) an election rule violation must be firmly established; and (2) there must be clear and convincing evidence that the violation could have affected the outcome of ...
VIEW DETAILS 1862 Kupsh, et al. v. UAW Region 8
Appellant raises important issues concerning the status and rights of newly organized members. The PRB has not previously had the occasion to address the selection of bargaining team members for a recently organized group. The Board agrees with the International Union that Articles 38 and 45 of the UAW Constitution ...
VIEW DETAILS 1861 Hall v. UAW Local Union 892
Appellant claims that the Local President violated Article 38, §1 of the UAW Constitution when she failed to appoint a temporary President while she attended a UAW conference for three days. Article 38, §1 lists the Executive Officers which each UAW local union is required to have. This provision also ...
VIEW DETAILS 1860 Joiner v. UAW Local Union 900
The PRB’s jurisdiction over appeals related to the processing of grievances is limited to claims that the matter was improperly handled because of fraud, discrimination, or collusion with management, or that the disposition or handling of the matter was devoid of any rational basis. Here, Appellant does not claim that ...
VIEW DETAILS 1859 Bell v. International Union, UAW
Article 33 of the UAW International Constitution sets forth the procedures and standards applicable to appeals presented to the IEB. Under this provision, the Appellant must supply certain basic information regarding the matter appealed. In this case, the International President’s office followed its standard procedure in requesting additional information from ...
VIEW DETAILS 1858 Clay v. UAW Local Union 3000
The PRB’s jurisdiction over claims arising from the disposition of collective bargaining grievances is limited to the question whether the matter was improperly handled because of fraud, discrimination, or collusion with management or whether the disposition was devoid of a rational basis. In this case, the PRB has no reason ...
VIEW DETAILS 1857 Woods v. International Union, UAW
This case involves an action taken by the Local Shop Committee. Therefore, the first level of appeal was to the Local membership. However, at the point in time when Appellant sent his appeal letter to the International President’s office, the Local membership had yet to consider his appeal. Subsequently, the ...
VIEW DETAILS 1856 Jones v. UAW Local Union 933
The Local Chairperson made a rational decision to withdraw Appellant’s grievance. Appellant was a low seniority employee who was disciplined multiple times during her short tenure with the Company. In fact, management previously disciplined Appellant for the same infraction which lead to her termination. When interviewed by the Company about ...
VIEW DETAILS 1855 Latif v. UAW Stellantis Department
Appellant does not claim that the International Representative’s decision to settle her grievance was the product of fraud, discrimination, or collusion with management. Accordingly, the PRB focuses on whether the decision to settle the grievance had a rational basis. The International Representative thoroughly investigated Appellant’s termination grievance but found that ...
VIEW DETAILS 1854 Sandoval v. International Union, UAW
To warrant overturning an election’s results and conducting a rerun, two requirements must be met: (1) an election rule violation must be firmly established; and (2) there must be clear and convincing evidence that the violation could have affected the outcome of the election. Appellant’s primary argument is that members ...
VIEW DETAILS