Posts Tagged ‘Local Union expenditure’
1468 Edwards v. Local Union 148
Edwards’ charges and his Ethical Practices Complaint are both based on his assertion the Local President did not follow the appropriate Constitutional method for testing the propriety of making the payments. Article 31 and the Ethical Practices Codes are not designed to challenge procedural errors. The appeal procedures described in Article 33 of the Constitution…
Read More1490 Turner v. IEB
The membership’s determination that the full-time editor was a necessary expense did not preclude a determination by the International President, acting on behalf of the IEB, that such a provision was inappropriate in the Local Union’s bylaws. Although the membership is entitled to determine what is a necessary expense for the Local within the meaning…
Read More1518 Franks and Smith v. Local 7777 Executive Board
Appellants’ charge that the Financial Secretary failed to present accurate financial reports to the membership was properly disqualified for it amounts to no more than an accusation that the Financial Secretary was negligent in the performance of her duties. The charge concerning the Local President’s failure to process appellants’ charge was also properly disqualified under…
Read More1548 II Sonnier, Turner, and Turner v. International President
The appeals were remanded to the IEB for a decision on the merits after the IEB dismissed them as untimely. The appeals cannot be dismissed as untimely because they were submitted within the Constitutional time limits. In response to the International Union’s failure to investigate and address appellants’ claims, we will take jurisdiction. After reviewing…
Read More1570 O’Connor et al. v. Local Union 974
A motion at a membership meeting that is silent with respect to a mandatory provision of the Local bylaws cannot override the clear language of those bylaws, and the bylaws in this case are clear. There was no waiver of the bylaws authorizing lost time and per diem for Convention delegates. A private agreement to…
Read More1575 Brant v. IEB
Brant was instructed on two occasions, once by the President’s staff and once by the International Auditor, to take his claim for compensation to the membership. He did so and the membership ruled in his favor. There was no appeal of the membership’s action, so the decision of the membership is controlling. Reconsideration was requested…
Read More1669 Douglas, Sr. v. Local Union 2262
Douglas argues that he lost the opportunity to work weekend overtime because he was performing duties for the Local on the Wednesday prior to the weekend. It appears that Douglas could have worked the weekend if he had contacted the employer or simply reported to work on the days in question. Therefore, his failure to…
Read More1689 Pearson v. Local Union 140
It is up to the local union membership to determine whether any expenditure is “necessary” within the meaning of Article 46, §1, of the Constitution, unless there has been a specific policy established by the IEB with respect to the issue. The membership rejected Pearson’s argument that he should have been reimbursed for assuming the…
Read More1713 Schoenecker v. International Union
Schoenecker did not engage in financial misconduct within the meaning of Article 48, §5, of the UAW Constitution by claiming lost time based on the assignments he would have received as a member of the launch team. Throughout his term of office as financial secretary, Schoenecker submitted vouchers for lost time based on his launch…
Read More1750 Hubbard v. International Union
Given the genuinely ambiguous text defining the president’s compensation subsequent to the sale of the Saline plant, if Hubbard had submitted claims for compensation based on occasional, carefully documented, telephone calls and other demands on her time outside of business hours, her right to such compensation would be difficult to challenge, even within the restrictive…
Read More